I am writing this blog as I enter my fourth week at ZAP Fitness. I came here by way of Indianapolis, Indiana and Grand Valley State University.

My first few weeks at ZAP have been filled with many new experiences: food (believe it or not I had not eaten a green vegetable in my life until a few weeks ago), mountainous terrain, living in the dirty south, coaching, and new teammates. Most important is the fact that nothing here felt strange or uncomfortable, and my new teammates felt like old teammates from day one. I am very lucky to have been able to rejoin my college teammate and friend Nate Peck. There aren’t too many guys in post-collegiate groups that have the opportunity to continue to train with their college teammates. 

My first few years of college were plagued with injury and setbacks, but that has passed and allowed me to improve significantly in the last couple of years. I’ve been given a unique and exciting opportunity here at ZAP to be able to push my body to it’s limits and reach my goals in running. I’m looking forward to hitting a large training block this fall gearing up for some big 5ks and 10ks this spring on track.

The spring season is a great time to be at ZAP.  The weather is mild.  The parks we frequent are in full bloom.  Everyone here is arriving at peak form and performing very well in races all over the country.  For me, too, the spring has been very exciting.  I came away from both the Mt. SAC and Cardinal Invitationals with substantial PRs in both the 5k and 10k, respectively.

More than breakthrough performances, however, I am most happy with the process I have gone through in achieving those new best times here at ZAP.  In this first year I am learning more and more about myself as an athlete.  I am becoming stronger and fitter than I ever have been before.I spent so much of my first year at ZAP rebuilding my fitness.  During that time, I learned a lot about the role that patience plays in our sport.  Occasionally it was difficult to compete in races while knowing that a best effort could still be so far off a goal pace.  Luckily, the environment here at ZAP is wonderful for keeping everything in perspective.  Most everyone has dealt with an injury at one point or another that has kept them from racing at the level they want to be competing at.

Looking ahead, I am excited for another great opportunity to run a personal best this weekend in the 10k.  Most of the ZAP crew will be there with me in Portland, OR, with each trying to better their 5k or 10k times and secure a spot on the starting line at the U.S. Outdoor Championships.
It has been a wonderful spring track season so far and I am looking forward to hopefully concluding this season in Eugene, OR at the U.S. Outdoor Championships.

I may have graduated from college exactly 1 year ago to this day, but that doesn't mean I've lost the spark of intellectual curiosity.  In fact, with Thomas and Warrenburg to argue with on daily runs, during dinner, and afterward in the kitchen, you could say the flame burns even brighter.  One of my favorite classes I took in college was entitled Judgment & Decision Making.  It was class that meshed professors from the departments of Psychology, Economics and International and Public Affairs.  During lectures, we frequently discussed different heuristics, or experienced-based techniques used during problem solving, learning and discovery.  Basically, a heuristic is a rapid, intuitive/unconscious "rules of thumb" that we begin to use as we mature and encounter situations.  Often times, we don't even know we are using them.  After I took this class, though, I began to notice the effect of heuristics in peculiar aspects of life, particularly running. 

Today I want to talk about a heuristic known as the Anchoring Effect.  Anchoring is a psychological phenomenon in which people tend to make assessments of situations based upon a reference point.  I started talking about the anchoring effect one night at the Zap dinner table in reference to predicting the time and finish of a race.  When discussing a future race and Dave says "I think Nate is going to run 13:45..." it is then impossible for me to make a prediction without taking into account the time he just said.  This effect can be particularly dramatic when the question you are trying to answer is completely unknown.  We love to make bets at Zap, so now when each of us decides to make our call for the correct time that the race will be won in, we all come up with our time prior to the first statement so as to not set a reference point and Anchor the others' guesses.  This can be especially important when betting on races like the marathon where the finishing time range can be several minutes.

ANYWAY, back to the point.  I started to notice something similar to the Anchoring Effect happening in the NCAA indoor mile this winter.  If you follow college track & field these days then you know that we have a seriously talented group of freshman runners this year.  And when I say "talented group of young runners," I don't mean it in the typical sense of a freshman running well for being a freshman, I mean guys who are leading the NCAA as freshman and competing on the world scene.  It seemed like every other weekend this winter and spring that a new bar was set.  Running under 4 minutes in the indoor mile used to be the bar, but after German Fernandez ran 3:55 in a low key race coming off of an injury, it seemed like things changed.  Guys started running 3:56, 3:57...and not being satisfied.  I see a phenomenon happening here and I think it has something to do with the Anchoring Effect.  As guys and girls run faster (and especially young ones) the whole mentality starts to shift.  What we once considered as fast, now has become a "good start," and what was once "phenomenal" is now the standard.  The new 'bar' is what we now set our references for outstanding times at. 

This is absolutely essential for American distance running.  To compete with the best at the world stage, we have to completely change our notions of what is really good.  There are hundred's of cliche quotes about "believing in yourself" and "shooting for the stars," but there is actually some truth to their underlying principles.  I love hearing about new American Records because it raises the bar one notch higher and forces everybody else to reassess what is good.  On a separate but related note, what I don't love is this year's slowing of the US National qualifying standards.  Set the standards slower, and people, on average, will run slower.

The tough part about heuristics is that they largely exist in the unconscious realm.  You cant just say "make 12:50 in the 5k your new standard of excellence," because that wouldn't be reasonable at this point.  What I did learn about changing heuristics in JDM was that knowing is half the battle.  Until we become consciously aware of these little mental speed-bumps, can we begin to expect changes in our psyche.

Completely disagree?  Feel free to share your thoughts...